課程資訊
課程名稱
資訊搜尋與決策行為
Special Topic on Information Seeking and Decision Making 
開課學期
104-1 
授課對象
文學院  圖書資訊學研究所  
授課教師
唐牧群 
課號
LIS7017 
課程識別碼
126 M0620 
班次
 
學分
全/半年
半年 
必/選修
選修 
上課時間
星期四2,3,4(9:10~12:10) 
上課地點
圖資研討三 
備註
限碩士班以上
總人數上限:8人 
Ceiba 課程網頁
http://ceiba.ntu.edu.tw/1041LIS7017_ISDM 
課程簡介影片
 
核心能力關聯
核心能力與課程規劃關聯圖
課程大綱
為確保您我的權利,請尊重智慧財產權及不得非法影印
課程概述

Rarely do we acquire an information good after we experience it in its entirety. Individuals learn about a work from partial information (e.g. reviews, word-of-month, summaries and abstracts etc.), therefore the inevitable uncertainty in predicting the content and relevance of a work.
The nature of uncertainty experienced by users is likely to change in a digital environment. While perusing of the content of a work is circumscribed in an online environment, novle deicsion aids such as user reviews and recommender systems are becoming more prevalent to reduce decision uncertainty and promote sereendiptitous information encounters.
The course is designed to explore various aspects of decision making in information consumption. While uncertainty has long been recognized as an important factor in information behavior literature, little has been addressed from the perspective of the uncertainty involved in deciding what information to consume. To provide the students necessary analytic tools for user decision making, a survey of relevant literature in cognitive science, social psychology, HCI, and consumer behaviors will be given, with a special focus on their implications on explaining and predicting information users' decision making.
It is hoped that a better understanding of the process of how users assimilate and combine various information cues in their information environment will provide valuable insights into the design of information services able to reduce search efforts and search uncertainty therefore promote higher user satisfaction. 

課程目標
The class will be organized according to the following modules:
1. Characteristics of information/creative products
2. The mediating role of "information cue"
3. Models in decision making (Bayesian inference, Len's model, bounded rationality)
4. Cognitive economy and information foraging theory
5. Decision biases and heuristics
6. Recommender systems and other consumer decision aids
 
課程要求
 
預期每週課後學習時數
 
Office Hours
另約時間 
指定閱讀
 
參考書目
Beach, L. R. and T. Connolly (2005), The Psychology of Decision Making. Sage.
Bettman, James R., Mary Frances Luce, and John W. Payne (1998), "Constructive
Consumer Choice Processes," Journal of Consumer Research, 25 (December), 187-
217.
Caves, R. E. (2002). Creative Industries. Harvard University Press.
Gigerenzer, G./Todd, P.M./ABC Group, eds. 1999. Simple Heuristics that Make Us
Smart. New York: Oxford University Press.
Goldman, A. I. (1999). Knowledge in a Social World. Oxford.
Gigerenzer, G. (2007). Gut feelings: the intelligence of the unconscious.
Penguin.
Guadagno, R.E., R. B. Cialdinin (2003). Online persuasion and compliance:
social influence on the Internet and beyond. In Amichai-Hamburger (Ed.).
The Social Net: the social psychology of the Internet.
Kahneman, D. (2003). A perspective on judgment and choice. American
Psychologist, 58, 697-720.
Devetag, M. G. (1999). From utilities to mental models: a critical survey on
decision rules and cognition in consumer choice. Technical Report 2, CEEL
(Computable and Experimental Economics Laboratory).
Kahneman, D. & Tversky, A. (Eds.) (2000). Choices, Values, and Frames. New
York: Cambridge University Press.
Hastie, Dawes (2001). Rational choice in an uncertain world: the psychology of
judgment and decision making. Sage.
Hardman, D. (2009). Judgment and Decision Making. Wiley-Blackwell. l
Haubl, G., Trifts, Valerie. (2000). Consumer Decision Making in Online
Shopping Environments: The Effects of Interactive Decision Aids. Marketing
Science, 19(1), 4.
Hughes, Benjamin; Wareham, J. & Joshi, Indra (2010). Doctors' online
information needs, cognitive search strategies and judgments of
information quality and cognitive authority: How predictive judgments
introduce bias into cognitive search models. Journal of The American
Society for Information
Science and Technology, 61(3), 433-452.
Koehler, D. and N. Harvey (2004). Judgment and decision making. Blackwell
Publishing.
Kuo F. Y, T-H Chu, Hsu M. H. and Hsieh H-S. (2004). An investigation of effort-
accuracy trade-off and the impact of self-efficacy on web searching
behaviors. Decision Support System, 37, pp.331-342.
Linden, G., B. Smith, et al. (2003). "Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item
collaborative filtering." IEEE Internet Computing 7(1): 76-80.
Sheth, J. N. and Mittal, B. (2004). Customer Behavior: a managerial
perspective. Thomson.
Newell, B. R., D. A. Lagnodo, and D. R. Shanks (2007). Straight Choices: the
psychology of decision making. Psychology Press.
Bayard, P. (2007). How to talk about books you haven't read. Bloomsbury.
Payne, J. W. J. R. Bettman, E. J Johnson (1993). The adaptive decision maker.
Cambridge University Press.
Dellarocas, C. (2003). The digitization of word of mouth: promise and
challenges of online feedback mechanisms. Management Science, 40, 1407-
1424.
Leino, J, K.-J. Raiha (2008). User experiences and impressions of recommenders
in complex information environment. Bulletin of the IEEE Computer Society
Techniacal Committee on Data Engineering.
Linden, G., B. Smith, et al. (2003). "Amazon.com recommendations: item-to-item
collaborative filtering.
Lopes, A. B, D. Galletta (2006). Consumer perceptions and willingness to pay
for intrinsically motivated online content. Journal of Management
Information System, V. 23, N. 2, pp. 203-231.
Mittal, B. (2004). Lack of Attribute Searchability: Some thoughts. Psychology
and Marketing, 21(5), 443.
Pirolli, P. (2007). Information foraging theory: Adaptive interaction with
information. Oxford series in human-technology interaction. Oxford: Oxford
University Press.
Lurie and Mason (2007). Visual representation: implications for decision
making. Journal of Marketing. V. 71, 160-177.
M.-C. Tang (2009). A study of academic library users’ decision making
process: a Len’s model approach. Journal of Documentation, 65(6).
Ross (1999). Finding without seeking: the information encounter in the context
of reading for pleasure. Information Processing and Management. 35, pp.
783-799.
Rothman and Salovey (1997). Shaping perceptions to motivate healthy behavior:
the role of message framing. Psychological Bulletin, 121, 1, p.3-19.
B. Sarwar, G. Karypis, J. Konstan, and J. Riedl, Item-Based Collaborative
Filtering Recommendation Algorithms Proc. 10th World Wide Web (WWW10)
Conf., pp. 285-295, 2001.
Sandstrom, P. E. (1994). An Optimal Foraging Approach to Information-seeking
and use. Library Quarterly, 64(4), 414-449.
Shapiro, C., & Varian, H. R. (1999). Information rules: a strategic guide to
the network economy Boston, Mass. :: Harvard Business School Press.
David, Shay and T. Pinch (2005). Six Degrees of Reputation: The Use and Abuse
of Online Recommendation Systems, available at at the Social Science
Research Network (SSRN) Web site:
Salganik et al. (2006). “Experimental study of inequality and
unpredictability in an artificial cultural market.”Science, 311:854-856.
Shafir E. I. Simonson, A. Tversky (1993). Reason-based choice. Cognition,
49, pp.11-36.
Simonson (2005). Determinants of customers' responsese to customized offers:
conceputal framework and research propositions. Journal of Marketing 69
(1). p. 32-45.
Slovic, P., M. L. Finucane, E. Peters, D. G. MacGregor (2006). The Affect
Heuristic. European Journal of Operational Research, 117, pp. 1333-1352.
Stvilla, B. et al. (2009). A model for online consumer health information
quality. JASIST.
Thaler, R. H. Sunstein (2008). Nudge: improving decisions about health, wealth
and happiness.
Wang, Peiling, D. Soergel (1998). A cognitive model of document use during a
research project. Study I. Document selection. Journal of American
Society for Information Science. 49(2):115-133.
Wilson, P. (1983). Second-hand knowledge: an inquiry into cognitive authority.
Wyer, R.S. (2008). "The Role of Knowledge Accessibility in Cognition and
Behavior: Implications For Consumer Information Processing," In C.
Haugtvedt, F. Kardes, & P. Herr. (Eds.), Handbook of Consumer Psychology.
Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum, 2008, 31-76. 
評量方式
(僅供參考)
 
No.
項目
百分比
說明
1. 
Participation 
10% 
Will be evaluated on your attendance and participation (i.e. the questions you raise and answers you give in the class or through discuss forum).  
2. 
Short reading response essays  
20% 
Each student will turn in 4 essays in response to 4 different topics covered (including empirical studies reported by the students) throughout the semester. Things you can talk about in the essay include what you have learned, what you don't understand, and what most interests you in the assigned texts or studies. Each eassy be less than one page long and it should be posted on the class website no later than a week after the text has been discussed.  
3. 
Empirical research review  
30% 
Each student will present one empirical study (See below for a list of articles to be reviewed). This assignment is designed to help familiarize yourself with the actual user study procedures. The review should consist of the following basic elements of an empirical research: a. Research questions b. Theoretical framework c. Hypoteses d. Methodology e. Design f. Findings g. Critiques: strengths and potential flaws (e.g. threats to external or internal validity) No written report for this assignment. Prepare a 30 mintues powerpoint presentation and a 10 mintues Q&A sessoin. The powerpoint file is to be posted on the class website one day before the date on which your presentation is scheduled. List of articless to be reviewed please check the bulletin board. 
4. 
Term paper  
40% 
Each group (for graduate students, each individual) will write a research proposal that informed by theories or empricial studies introduced in the class, which is due at the end of the semester. As the forcus of the paper will be the methodology, a lengthy literature review is not requried. It will be a user study that consists of the following components: a. Theoretical framework and problem statement (1-2 pages) b. Study objectives (1-2 pages) c. Research Questions (1-2 pages) d. Research procedures (methodology, design, instruments) (4-8 pages) e. Expected difficulties (1-2) pages f . Presentation of the project to the class  
 
課程進度
週次
日期
單元主題
無資料